The Universal Seed Bank of the Spitzberg would be the last resource in case of a disaster. It is the infinite material growth, in our limited-resourced world, which highly risks to endanger the planet and should make it hungry in the next decades. “We hope and act for the best but we must prepare for the worst…” the President of the European Commission José-Manuel Barroso declared, during the inauguration ceremony, the last 26th of February. Echoing him, the Norwegian Prime Minister even said: “The biologic diversity is threatened by the forces of Nature and by the actions of Men” whereas, in company of the 2004 Nobel Prize for Peace Wangari Maathai, they symbolically dropped mini bags of rice coming from 104 countries in the underground building. “It is one of the most innovating and impressive actions for Humanity” the General Director of FAO Jacques Diouf underlined.
The entire global agronomic community indeed applauded the safety net which allows to keep in a giant freezer the species in two exemplars. Gert Kleijer, the Swiss Supervisor of the Gene Bank of Agroscope-Changins, was proud of the huge storage capacity of the Svalbard facility with which he has a partnership. The protection of biodiversity could be the key to a reinforcement of the food production, with the varieties of the main alimentary bases of Africa, Asia and the Southern American continent like wheat, rice, corn, sorghum, black-eyed bean or rustic species of vegetables.
The initiative is found useful by the French teacher at the Agronomic Superior School of Montpellier Jean-Marie Prosperi who never the less doubts that this strong room can keep seeds intact for several hundred years. He points out that the project excludes species which tend to multiply such as potatoes, fruit-trees, vine, coffee or cacao which cannot resist the cold.
As an ecologist, Wangari Maathai, in his inaugural speech, qualified the project as “visionary” and as a “precaution for the future”. But many, like the Canadian astrophysicist Hubert Reeves, declare that they rather grant it a symbolic value than an actual usefulness. According to him, “it is a good idea at the origin, but it will not necessarily work since species cannot be reused without their environment. In time, the climate and the environment evolve and the seeds, blocked by the freezing, will not be able to adapt themselves anymore. The seeds need to enrich their genetic heritage in order to survive. “The best way to safeguard them is probably to cultivate them, not ice them” the spokesman of the Kokopelli association for preservation of ancient species Raoul Jacquin pointed out.
So here we are. Can the myth of Noah’s Ark resist to modern times and the future? Does the Svalbard global reserve represent the last attempt of Mankind to own a life attic? And how can anyone know who will own its keys in the future? Is it possible to imagine a planetary disruption and the stability of this frozen piece of land at the same time?
“The world is a safer place today” Cary Fowler declared the morning of the inauguration. Of course it is not, some sceptical people may say. But so Manichean… Or perhaps simply romantic…